![]() |
Whistleblowers Australia |
|
_________________________________
News ReleaseThe 'Whistling-While-They-Work' Study led by Griffith UniversityA draft report resulting from the above study was published on 24 October 2007. One of the participating and funding agencies of the above study is the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in NSW. At about the time the draft report was released, it published an article on its web site entitled New research busts whistleblower bad treatment myth.Whistleblowers Australia (WBA) believes that there are fundamental flaws in the study. For example, the definition of whistleblower used by the researchers includes employees who had personnel (sic) or workplace grievances. WBA believes the definition should include only public-interest whistleblowers, such as staff who reported corruption, waste, etc., and not those with grievances or internal corporate disputes. The NSW ICAC's assertion that only 22 per cent of the whistleblowers surveyed said they were treated badly by management or co-workers, besides being premature (as it is based on a draft report) is misleading, as the figure on which it is based included many staff members who were not whistleblowers. Nonetheless, Whistleblowers Australia would be concerned even if it were true that 'only' 22% of whistleblowers were subsequently victimised, harrassed, or otherwise maltreated. Furthermore, even a figure of 22% hardly supports the ICAC's assertion that it is a myth that whistleblowers are treated badly. Whistleblowers Australia is preparing a more comprehensive critique of the Whistling-While-They-Work study. This will be published on this web site shortly. Meanwhile, the President of the NSW Branch of Whistleblowers Australia wrote to the Commissioner of the NSW ICAC on 18 January 2008. A copy of this letter may be viewed or downloaded here as a PDF file. (Windows users: Either click to open the file in a new browser window, or right-click and choose the save as... option to save the file on your computer.) As stated in the letter, WBA has already formally complained to Griffith University and is preparing formal comments on the Griffith University research. On 10 December 2007 Peter Bennett, the National President of Whistleblowers Australia, wrote to the Commissioner of the Corruption and Crime Commission (CCC) of Western Australia in connection with what WBA sees as misinformation in the Commission's newsletter of November 2007. A copy of this letter may be viewed or downloaded here. The reply from the CCC may be found here. On 19 October 2007 Peter Bennett, the National President of Whistleblowers Australia, wrote to the then Prime Minister, John Howard, requesting that the coalition announce its policies in relation to government transparency and the protection of people who discover and dislose wrongdoing in organisations and particularly in the public sector. This letter may be found here. The reply from the Coalition's Campaign Headquarters dated 9 November 2007, which avoided the questions and merely repeated the Coalition's pre-election sales talk, may be found here. Further updates are to follow... ~~ The National Committee, Whistleblowers
Australia, Inc. 28 January 2008; Updated 26 February 2008 ~~
_________________________________
|
Whistleblowers A person is a whistleblower by her/his actions and does not need to be registered or identified with any organisation. Self-help and mutual help |
Campaigns
|
The Organisation |
Unauthorised News Releases in the Name of Whistleblowers Australia, Inc. Readers should note the following Policy on News Releases, Comment to Media, etc. that was passed as a motion at the AGM on 1 December, 1996, in Sydney: Any member of the national executive can issue a news release or comment to the media. In normal circumstances, news releases should be checked first with another member of the executive, typically the president, vice-president or director. In all cases, approval should be sought in advance from anyone whose name is given in a release. The same sort of policy should be followed by branches, with variations depending on branch structure. At present, there is no State Branch or media office in Victoria, although WBA does have contacts in that State. Only approved news releases may be considered to be genuine news releases from Whistleblowers Australia. The current office-bearers on the National Committee may be found on the following page: http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/contacts/au_wba/committee.html. (This link should open in a new page; if it does not, you may need to change your browser setting or right-click the link and select the menu option to do so.) |
MembershipMembership includes a subscription to our newsletter, The Whistle. Associate Membership is also available for $12 per annum to people on low incomes. (Excludes The Whistle.) The activities of Whistleblowers Australia Inc. depend on
voluntary
work by members and supporters. We value the ideas, time, expertise and
involvement of our members and supporters. This site is maintained by the NSW Branch of Whistleblowers Australia.
|
Disclaimer: All material on this site expresses the opinion of the author/s of the material and is not to be regarded as full and complete. Published material does not represent the opinions or views of Whistleblowers Australia Inc. or individual members of WBA unless expressly stated. Whistleblowers Australia Inc. and its branches are not responsible for material on other sites.
Email:
wba@whistleblowers.org.au
(No Spam, please.)
Senders of spam (UCE/UBE) and similar junk mail should read our Terms
and Conditions of Use of our email facilities.
HOME:
http://www.whistleblowers.org.au If this page does not
have an
index frame on the left, click here
Copyright Whistleblowers Australia 2007-2008. (Last update: 26
February 2008.)